Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

(DOWNLOAD) "Joseph M. Wahrhaftig Et Al. v. Space Design Group" by Supreme Court of New York ~ eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Joseph M. Wahrhaftig Et Al. v. Space Design Group

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Joseph M. Wahrhaftig Et Al. v. Space Design Group
  • Author : Supreme Court of New York
  • Release Date : January 12, 1968
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 69 KB

Description

Per Curiam. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term which referred defendants' motion to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction to another Special Term for trial by jury (in accordance with defendants' demand under CPLR 2218), of the issue of fact, raised on the motion, as to the alleged service of the summons upon the defendants. In their amended answer, by way of an affirmative defense, the defendants for the first time objected to jurisdiction, alleging that ""the Court does not have jurisdiction of the person of either of the defendants herein in that neither of the defendants were served with a copy of the summons."" The motion, not being made ""before service of the responsive pleading"" (CPLR 3211, subd. [ e ] ), was not timely and should have been denied on that ground. So far as here pertinent, the statute provides that ""an appearance of the defendant is equivalent to personal service of the summons upon him, unless an objection to jurisdiction under paragraph eight of subdivision (a) of rule 3211 is asserted by motion or in the answer as provided in rule 3211."" (CPLR 320, subd. [ b ] .) CPLR 3211, thus referred to, provides, in subdivision (a) thereof, that: ""A party may move for judgment dismissing one or more causes of action asserted against him on the ground that * * * 8. the court has not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant"" and, in subdivision (e) thereof, that: ""At any time before service of the responsive pleading is required, a party may move on one or more of the grounds set forth in subdivision (a), and no more than one such motion shall be permitted. * * * An objection based upon a ground specified in paragraphs eight or nine of subdivision (a) is waived if a party moves on any of the grounds set forth in subdivision (a) without raising such objection or if, having made no objection under subdivision (a), he does not raise such objection in the responsive pleading."" (Emphasis supplied.) The quoted provisions with respect to remedy by motion or by defensive pleading


Ebook Download "Joseph M. Wahrhaftig Et Al. v. Space Design Group" PDF ePub Kindle